<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>OPTIMAL Theory on Beyond the Stats</title>
    <link>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/series/optimal-theory/</link>
    <description>Recent content in OPTIMAL Theory on Beyond the Stats</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 19:34:00 +0900</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/series/optimal-theory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Design the Attention: What Coaches Need to Know About External Focus</title>
      <link>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/posts/optimal-theory-5/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 19:34:00 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/posts/optimal-theory-5/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the previous post, I explained that a player&amp;rsquo;s attention is a &lt;strong&gt;limited cognitive resource&lt;/strong&gt;, and what goes wrong when it runs dry.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;As a follow-up, this post digs into the practical side: &lt;strong&gt;where, specifically, should we point that limited spotlight of attention?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attention Is a Limited Cognitive Resource</title>
      <link>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/posts/optimal-theory-4/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2026 18:35:00 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/posts/optimal-theory-4/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Up to the last post, I explained motivation, one of the two pillars supporting OPTIMAL theory and the learner&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;engine,&amp;rdquo; and how to draw it out. This time I dig into the other pillar: &lt;strong&gt;attention&lt;/strong&gt;, which handles the &amp;ldquo;steering&amp;rdquo; that guides that engine in the right direction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Two Pillars That Spark Intrinsic Motivation</title>
      <link>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/posts/optimal-theory-3/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:00:00 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/posts/optimal-theory-3/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;From here, I want to dig into the two pillars that act as concrete switches for physically starting the learner&amp;rsquo;s engine, motivation (intrinsic motivation): &lt;strong&gt;enhanced expectancies&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;autonomy support&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;switch-one-enhanced-expectancies&#34;&gt;Switch one: enhanced expectancies&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Enhanced expectancies&amp;rdquo; means raising the learner&amp;rsquo;s subjective sense of the probability of success in future performance, the feeling that &amp;ldquo;I can do this&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;it will work next time.&amp;rdquo; In other words, raising their &lt;strong&gt;self-efficacy&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Science of Intrinsic Motivation: Learners Who Drive Themselves</title>
      <link>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/posts/optimal-theory-2/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:13:00 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/posts/optimal-theory-2/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the previous post I gave a rough overview of OPTIMAL theory. From this post on, I will start taking it apart. Here I focus on &lt;strong&gt;motivation (intrinsic motivation)&lt;/strong&gt;, the fundamental engine that drives the learner, our &amp;ldquo;car,&amp;rdquo; powerfully forward.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OPTIMAL Theory: Accelerating Motor Learning</title>
      <link>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/posts/optimal-theory-1/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:10:00 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://beyond-the-stats.pages.dev/posts/optimal-theory-1/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-rise-and-fall-of-the-information-processing-approach&#34;&gt;The rise and fall of the information-processing approach&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For decades, theoretical frameworks for motor learning have been built on information-processing models. The best-known examples are the &lt;strong&gt;three-stage model&lt;/strong&gt; proposed by Fitts and Posner (1967), made up of the cognitive, associative, and autonomous stages, and Schmidt&amp;rsquo;s &lt;strong&gt;schema theory&lt;/strong&gt; (1975).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
